On abortion we do have the progress of biological science specifically in Japan and Holland, where biologists are able to fertilize sheep egg and sperm, and grow it from embryo to fetus to lamb to sheep. If the ideological schmucks at Planned Parenthood were savvy instead of ideological, they'd have spent their donations on this, in the US, or for R&D perfection, outside. This would be the way out of this, just as Musk and Bezos decided to perfect rockets that land in one piece back on the landing pad, rather than do ocean recovery. Not to bitch (but I will!), remember when you hated on the idea that treating people with better medicines, rather than just using the Inexpensive only choice available, rather than my proposal of treatments? I am am glad Pfizer listened to me rather than your cost-benefit analysis, because now they are even more richer. https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/13-things-to-know-paxlovid-covid-19
When the Reps start doing greater and greater totalitarianism at the state level there will be (as in laser physics) a back-reaction. Golly, Isaac Newton does it again! So your team will have a nice benefit from this. Vote wise, energy wise, and all that fun stuff. Enough young women jailed and or suicided will drive up the intensity of any campaign, barring a war by Putin or Xi. Not good optics for the Republicans, barring a war. Speaking of war, the last war a democrat got into, for fair or foul, was Lyndon Baines Johnson in 1964, and he was the peace candidate against Barry the warmonger Goldwater. On truth in history, 1619 fudge the facts but yeah, I say, The Truth will out. As George Carlin said, "The founding fathers signed the Constitution in 1789 (written in 1787), and then went home to fuck their slaves. As long as we tell the truth and your side doesn't like this especially when it comes to violent crime, I say lets know the truth as best we can? Speaking of Loonies, there is no such thing. There is only accurate or inaccurate. The ad hominem attacks work with your guys, because they like emotional & ideological, rather than observe and measure, which was once known as science. Whether it's slavery, or climate change, or inflation, what are the facts? Go Team! Here is what seems to be the facts, unless you got competing info? Here is from one of yours, Newsweek, from 2 hours ago. https://www.newsweek.com/trump-still-beats-biden-2024-rematch-despite-jan-6-hearings-polls-1727393 If you want to skip it, it just poses that as of now, as a snapshot in time, El Trumpo beats Joey in 2024. How he'd do against Hillary is not addressed or like Shapiro sez, Michelle Obama? Ah! Back to work for a bit... -----Original Message----- From: John Clark <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Sat, Jul 23, 2022 7:34 am Subject: Re: Does big government have the right to tell you how you may engage in consensual sex? On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 9:11 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > Here is our good buddy Ben Shapiro: "People think that it was a bunch of economically distressed people from the middle of the country who had been losing their jobs because of globalization with China and so they reacted by voting for Trump. Nobody there was voting for Trump because of his economic policy, nobody knows what his economic policy was.” I agree with what he said in the above but Mr. Shapiro is not my good buddy. >"People vote for Trump because he’s a giant pulsating middle finger to a bunch >of cultural elite who believe they have a better way to live.That better way >to live,involves them looking down their nose at people who attend church >regularly" It's true I look down my nose at people who believe there is an invisible man in the sky that occasionally talks to them and tells them what to do, as happened when the invisible man in the sky told George W. Bush to start the Iraq War, but it's also true that religious people look down their noses at me because I don't believe in that very same invisible man. And if He did give Bush that advice then God is a lousy advice giver. > "and at people who believe in traditional marriage and people who are > pro-life on abortion issues" I have absolutely NO PROBLEM with somebody who doesn't want to have an abortion or somebody who doesn't want to marry a person of their own sex. And I don't know anybody who does, but I most certainly DO have a problem with somebody who wants to force other people, by using the police, to make other people behave the same way they do even if their personal preferences are quite different. I make no apology for having contempt for that. > "American exceptionalism and who tend to like the flag". I also have contempt for those who want to whitewash the history books we used to teach our children so it looks like the USA has never done anything even a little unsavory much less downright evil. And I have contempt for those who believe that millions of American soldiers died to protect the piece of cloth, and want a constitutional amendment saying "Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States", with the precise meaning of the word "desecration" left vague. They claim such an amendment is necessary because right winger's are extremely delicate snowflakes who are easily offended and must be protected from things they might hear or see that could traumatize them. I say nobody ever died from being offended. I also note that Mr. Shapiro complains that the Democrats talk down to Republicans too much, but he also says that if the Democrats were savvy they should talk down to Republicans even more and pretend that all the idiotic things that they believe in were really logical. That does not compute, and that is not at all unusual when you're talking about right wing loonies like Mr. Shapiro. John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis rwl Yesterday the house passed legislation that would ensure contraception remains legal nationwide, the vote was 228 to 195, all the Democrats in the House voted for it but only 8 Republicans did, most didn't even want to make sure condoms remain legal. The legislation now goes to the Senate where Republicans are certain to kill it. On Tuesday the House passed legislation that would ensure gay marriage remains legal despite 157 Republicans voting against it. The legislation now goes to the Senate where the Republicans there are certain to kill it. And Republican Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said a month ago in his decision that overturned Roe versus Wade, that had given women the right to control their own bodies, that the court should also consider making consensual homosexual behavior illegal again. Do you see a pattern that Republicans have been following and should you encourage them to continue doing so by voting for them? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/372942069.742311.1658616030308%40mail.yahoo.com.
