On Sun, Aug 6, 2023 at 9:54 AM Alan Grayson <agrayson2...@gmail.com> wrote:
*> As far as consciousness is concerned, you've done your research on AG > and determined his creation was remarkably similar to yours. Hence, if you > consider yourself conscious, you can extend that belief to AG.* But I don't believe that Alan Grayson is conscious all the time, not when he's sleeping or or under anesthesia or dead because during those times he is not behaving intelligently. *> Generally, that in principle is what we humans habitually do. But AI > does not fall into this category of YOUR knowing. To equate your knowledge > of AG with AI is just a foolish extrapolation. AG* > By using your same logic would it also be foolish extrapolation for GPT-4 to conclude that human beings are conscious? That is the more important question because in the long run it won't really matter if humans think an AI is conscious or not, but an AI's opinion of human beings will matter a lot, at least for the humans. John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis> chf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv3MEJkWJHW28zsQis-u2%3DE%3DwyG4i%3DwqVC9t5%3DTqHAe%2B%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com.
