On Sunday, June 23, 2024 at 10:12:28 PM UTC+2 John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 3:01 PM PGC <[email protected]> wrote: > *Do note, I am not making a claim that there is nothing to LLMs and their recent boost in applications, capacity, conveniences offered, and similar developments. But it’s narrow AI by definition* By what definition? The standard definition of everybody from Science Fiction authors to the field of research. The one you are already well aware of. Ask your LLM of choice, perform a search on your search engine, or go to Wikipedia regarding narrow or weak AI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_artificial_intelligence And for everybody here assuming the Mechanist ontology, which implies the Strong AI thesis, i.e. the assertion that a machine can think, I am curious as to why any of you would assume that general intelligence and mind would arise from a narrow AI. Narrow is the opposite of some advanced Turing + machine with inductive reasoning abilities, which partly define it. Because sure, such a machine could conceive of, run, emulate, implement, build any possible narrow AI by definition, but not the opposite. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/c2d4928a-6440-472c-a64b-d12cb15c54can%40googlegroups.com.
