@PGC. People that need references when they cannot even read the main text
have IQ of 2 digits and are also sexually virgin. No point having any
discussion with them. Enjoy!
On Friday 30 August 2024 at 15:03:11 UTC+3 PGC wrote:
> On Friday, August 30, 2024 at 9:48:12 AM UTC+2 Cosmin Visan wrote:
>
> I am God. And so are you. We are all one and the same God dreaming
> infinite dreams.
>
>
> These kinds of statements become problematic when expressed publicly. It's
> the same error of institutionalized religions, that make the equivalence
> between possible personal private beliefs and normative public statements
> ("should be taught in schools and all the other 'shoulds' that are
> implied), seem legitimate.
>
> But it's the kind of statement I'd expect from you. Your papers contain
> close to zero (if not zero) references to all the work of others that have
> informed similar metaphysical positions. It's intellectual theft. You
> apparently don't care to signal that you take ideas from other writers and
> even from this list/members.
>
> And that makes you fail at being credible. For even if we include the
> rather large nuance that you made a private statement above and do not seek
> authority (it's transparent and obvious by now that you do, seeking naive
> followers and taking others' ideas to be your own, insults etc.), it's
> clear that you don't live by the implications of your own statement: Would
> a god recognizing the god/themselves in others not respect other people in
> basic discourse without personal attacks, stealing ideas, and normative
> statements like "you haven't read my papers enough!" or "You read them in
> the wrong way because you are sexually frustrated". You do not abide by
> your own conviction and loose credibility.
>
> The list is immune to these cheap rhetorical tricks that showcase more
> your own insecurities, lack of faith in your own assertions (such as the
> one above) and frustrations than anybody else's.
>
> If we are all one in some private sense, it follows that you recognize
> that same quality in others and act accordingly. In particular, not
> confusing private beliefs with normative public assertions. That is the
> manipulative move of thieves, institutional religions, ideologists,
> fanatics, tyrants etc.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/8dc1b61b-0892-491a-8128-d21e461a0a30n%40googlegroups.com.
