On 9/12/2024 9:21 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Thursday, September 12, 2024 at 3:55:45 AM UTC-6 Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Le jeu. 12 sept. 2024, 11:53, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> a
écrit :
On Thursday, September 12, 2024 at 2:40:56 AM UTC-6 Quentin
Anciaux wrote:
I just gave you a full proof that as long as the expansion
is uniform and expansion rate > 0, then it follows objects
will sooner or later recess from each other at speed > c.
What was the justification for the geometric progression? I
made no such assumption in my "proof".
As explained multiple times and in the quote you made, expansion
is uniform and happens at every point in space.
What bothers me about your method is that you*assume* a geometric
increase in the separation distance, when, IMO, that's the variable
that must be calculated (which I did). So no matter how many times you
affirm your proof as valid, I can't agree. AG
You didn't calculate the expansion parameter, which is the Hubble
constant. It's an observed value.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/cf827be3-20cf-460f-ba37-0c0f702a9be7n%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/cf827be3-20cf-460f-ba37-0c0f702a9be7n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/e450e80e-c405-4b5e-b831-6b9679c3f251%40gmail.com.
