On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 8:46 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:

*>> The observational fact that Bell's Inequality is violated. I find that
> spooky, and as Niels Bohr said "anybody who is not shocked by quantum
> mechanics does not understand it". *
>
>
> *> Yes, we agree. It's truly spooky and tends to support Bohr's claim that
> measurement causes the properties being measured;*
>

*Except that Bohr's Copenhagen interpretation couldn't explain exactly, or
even approximately, what a "measurement" is, Many Worlds can do that simply
by replacing "measurement" with "entanglement". If Bohr performs the two
slit experiment and his experimental equipment records which slit the
electrons went through, then the equipment becomes entangled with the
electrons, and if Bohr looks at those Instruments he becomes entangled with
the experimental equipment, and thus he detects no interference pattern.
But if the equipment doesn't record which-way information then Bohr will
see an interference pattern.  A measurement by an intelligent entity can
cause entanglement, but so can an infinite number of other things.*


*>> If the entire universe became infinite at the same instant the
> transformation from nothingness to somethingness occurred then the universe
> wouldn't need to expand at all to remain infinite.*
>
>
> *> **You're positing an instantaneous transition from Nothing to Infinite
> Something.*
>

*Even an instantaneous transition from nothing to finite something at T=0
already involves infinity, and if you add one infinity to another infinity
you still end up with the same infinity. But for all we know there might
not even be a T= 0, maybe the universe is cyclical, or maybe the big bang
was just the start of our little out-of-the-way corner of the multiverse.
Nobody knows, someday we might know but it won't be because somebody was
sitting in a comfortable chair thinking about philosophy. If you really
want to solve the most profound questions you're going to need to get your
hands dirty and perform some experiments.  *


*>> The universe could be temporally finite but spatially infinite, or
> spatially finite but temporally infinite, or both could be infinite, or
> neither could be infinite. Nobody knows, not even you.  *
>
>
> *> Something cannot become infinite through finite processes,*
>

*Yes.*


> *>* *I see time evolving as space evolves,*
>

*Maybe but that is far from obvious because we already know that time
and space have fundamentally different properties. There is only one
dimension of time but three dimensions of space, and time has a direction
but space does not, and at least in big bang cosmology, time is infinite in
one direction but not in the other.  *

*> I didn't claim the universe is infinite. I just asserted that IF is, it
> had no beginning; that is, it would be UNCREATED.*
>

*If time is infinite not just in one direction but in both directions then
obviously the universe would have to have been uncreated. And that would be
true regardless of if space is infinite or finite. And you did say "I see
time evolving as space evolves".*


> > *Moreover, IF our bubble is finite, which I tend to believe,*
>

*Everybody believes the observable universe is finite.  *

*> since it can be enclosed by a sphere of finite radius, I concluded it
> can't be flat, since that implies infinite in spatial extent.*
>

*NO. **The finite observable universe can be contained in a finite sphere
regardless of what the shape of the entire universe is.  *

* > But if we believe the unobservable part came into existence during
> Inflation,*
>

*Long before anybody came up with the idea of cosmological inflation,
everybody believed there must be parts of the universe, perhaps very big
parts perhaps infinitely big parts, that we will never be able to see
because light moves at a finite speed and the big bang happened a finite
number of years ago, and nobody believed that the Earth really was the
center of the universe.   *

  John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>
qqv

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv3_Tark6Api77DO5F4mvrm7DCUkUQvqNU3iGPp2o-BbAA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to