The fact that you never specify whether "synchronized" means "set to the
same time" or "caused to run at the same rate" or both, makes me think
you don't understand your own question.
Brent
On 10/23/2024 6:00 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
In this scenario, is there any contradition with the principles of SR?
Suppose there exist two inertial frames, moving in opposite directions
with velocity v < c along the x-axis, where one clock of each frame is
initially located one unit, positively and negatively respectively
from the origin, and when these clocks are juxtaposed at the origin,
the multiple set of clocks in both frames can be synchronized? Does
this scenario imply an unwarranted affirmation of simultaneity?
TY, AG
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d2870ea8-f2dc-49ff-9aad-3f7feb1e812dn%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d2870ea8-f2dc-49ff-9aad-3f7feb1e812dn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a1dd9f28-d991-444f-bf9a-1f03a69f2885%40gmail.com.
