On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 05:38:32AM -0800, PGC wrote:
> 

...

> 
>     Bear in mind, I haven't read Metzinger's book yet - just some of the
>     reviews. I don't know what is actually being claimed.
> 
> 
> I've read earlier writings and skimmed through some of this. While appearing
> organized and rigorous on the surface, I see him violating Occam many times
> besides conflating physical notions with immaterial metaphysical one all the
> time. E.g. for the Suchness chapter, where I kind of had an immediate hunch
> that he'd do this:
> 
> I have already offered a phenomenological reinterpretation of “emptiness” as
> “epistemic openness.” One prediction would be that in all situations in which
> subject/ object structure fades away, “emptiness” and “epistemic openness” 
> will
> be properties not only of the conscious mind, but also of what were previously
> taken to be inanimate perceptual objects. Suchness then becomes the emptiness
> of appearances in the more precise sense of their being epistemically open, 
> for
> example in terms of lacking a predetermined conceptual essence. 
>  
> Taking such liberties, you can say anything. Closer to poetry/fiction/personal
> opinion.
> 
>

Thanks - I'll keep your comments in mind when I come to read it.

> 
> 
>     > By the way, how are the corals doing and are you still diving, Russell?
>     Is
>     > there some healing or everything getting more and more bleached? 
>     >
> 
>     I live about 2000 km from the Great Barrier Reef. I understand the
>     bleaching is pretty bad, but haven't visited that area for about 20
>     years, so I can't say first hand. The way things are going, we might
>     start getting coral growing off our coast instead.
> 
> 
> 
>     I haven't dived for about 3 years - just been too freaking busy to get
>     my gear fixed after it broke down. It doesn't help that my local dive
>     shop closed down just after the pandemic, so have to go further afield
>     for gear repairs and tank fills.
> 
> 
> Pretty bad could mean a lot. Are there still areas where things remain close 
> to
> not being affected; e.g. places with a lot of open ocean current? 
>

I believe so. Tourists would be taken to areas where the reef is
pristine, or course. And certainly some areas have recovered. But open
ocean current is not the issue - it's all open ocean - the issue is
sometimes the water is too hot, and with climate change, those events
are becoming more frequent.

There should be a report on the 'net about how much of the reef has
bleached to date.



-- 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Russell Standish                    Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders     [email protected]
                      http://www.hpcoders.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/ZzZyuSv7yK53ixYF%40zen.

Reply via email to