FWIW, I've always thought Born's Rule refers to the Frequentist Theory of Probabilility (FTP). Moreover, I don't recall my professors explicitly stating this, but it was, AFAICT, the unstated assumption, likely inherited from slit experiments and the need for a multitude of trials to establish the interference pattern. And I've always assumed the FTP *means* that for a given probability value, and some assumed tolerance (the epsilon number in the concept of limits), there exists a certain number of trials for which there's a convergence to that value. But Born's Rule doesn't tell us what that number is (which will be different for each context of probability). AG
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/42588ca3-4da2-4f55-a445-124ece6f7e0bn%40googlegroups.com.
