On 12/10/2024 11:44 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Tuesday, December 10, 2024 at 11:40:10 PM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote:

    On Tuesday, December 10, 2024 at 11:15:16 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:

        Do I not only have provide a diagram I also have to explain it
        in detail just to end this silly thread??


    *Yes you do. Providing plots without the numerical values in the
    LT, is useless. I can't tell if you're drawing plots to satisfy
    your biases, or if the numbers support the case you're making.
    Lesson learned; always do a real proof, which means supplying the
    arguments, or STFU. AG *


*Brent; your numbers check out. The car fits with ease from the pov of the garage frame, but not from the pov of the car frame. But this bothers me since we know that all frames are equivalent in SR. How then can two, so-called equivalent frames, gives different results? Using the LT, measurements in different frames generally differ, but here something more fundamental seems to be happening; namely, that the car fits and doesn't fit, depending on the frame being analyzed. AG
*
"All frames are equivalent", doesn't mean they agree on frame dependent things like simultaneity.  They agree on physical events. That's why I plotted the simultaneous endpoints of the car from the frame where it wasn't moving into the frame where it was moving.  It illustrates that the car doesn't shrink, rather the identification of simultaneous endpoints changes.  The simultaneous endpoints of the car in the second diagram, in which the car is moving, are different and closer together in space because of the change in simultaneity, not because the car is shorter.

Brent


        First note by comparing the two diagrams that the car is
        longer than the garage, 12' vs 10'.  So the car doesn't fit at
        small relative speed.  What does "fit" mean?  It means that
        the event of the front of the car coinciding with the
        right-hand end of the garage is after or at the same time as
        the rear of the car coinciding with the left-had end of the
        garage.  In both diagrams the car is moving to the right at
        0.8c so \gamma=sqrt{1-0.8^2}=0.6.  Consequently, in the car's
        reference frame, the garage is contracted to 6' length and
        when the rear of the car is just entering the garage, the
        front is /*simultaneously*/, in the car's reference frame,
        already 6' beyond the right-hand end of the garage.



        Then in the garage's reference frame the car's length is
        contracted to 0.6*12'=7.2' so at the moment the front of the
        car coincides with the right end of the garage, the rear of
        the car will simultaneously, in the garage reference system,
        be 2.8' inside the garage as shown below.

        Note that in the above diagram I have marked two simultaneous
        events with small \delta's.  The diagram below is just the
        Lorentz transform of the one above. The two simultaneous
        \delta's are also in the diagram below.  You can confirm they
        are the same events by referring to the time blips along the
        world lines, which are also just the Lorentz transforms of
        those above. But clearly the events marking the simultaneous
        locations of the rear and front of the car above are NOT
        simultaneous in the garage  frame below.  Conversely, the
        front and rear simultaneous locations of the car below are not
        simultaneous in the above diagram, as the reader is invited to
        confirm by plotting them. Simultaneity is frame dependent.



        Incidentally, when I was in graduate school this was still
        know as the "Tank Trap Paradox".  The idea was that if one dug
        a tank trap shorter than the enemy tank, then the tank would
        just bridge the hole, UNLESS the tank were going very fast in
        which its contracted length would allow it to fall into the
        trap.  This was being explained to me by Jurgen Ehlers, whom
        you may correctly infer from his name was a German professor
        recently hired at Univ Texas.  I said, "What is it with you
        Germans, illustrating things with tank traps and cats in boxes
        with poison gas?"  Jurgen who was too young to have fought in
        the war didn't realize I was pulling his leg and he was struck
        speechless.

        Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a1e77c16-d966-4d65-935a-e3e601715f79n%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a1e77c16-d966-4d65-935a-e3e601715f79n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/86cc7d7b-af65-4749-879e-0ab2cf8f5a54%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to