On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 08:11:36PM -0800, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Saturday, December 14, 2024 at 5:56:21 AM UTC-7 John Clark wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 4:13 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > If local realism is falsified by Bell experiments, does that mean > non-locality is affirmed? > > > No. > John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis > > > Is this the general consensus in the physics community, or is there none. Is > this just your opinion? AG
It is the concensus, because the Bell inequality is a theorem, and the observed violation of it is a violation of at least one of the three assumptions (reality, locality and determinism). Only if you assume both reality and determinism can you conclude that QM is non-local. > > 9u7 > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email > to [email protected]. > To view this discussion visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list > /4e4cd7b1-0a4f-44a6-b1b8-4ec24e489275n%40googlegroups.com. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders [email protected] http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/Z2EGHci2I9S_DDtK%40zen.
