On 1/5/2025 6:00 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Tuesday, December 10, 2024 at 11:15:16 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:

    Do I not only have provide a diagram I also have to explain it in
    detail just to end this silly thread??

    First note by comparing the two diagrams that the car is longer
    than the garage, 12' vs 10'.  So the car doesn't fit at small
    relative speed.  What does "fit" mean?  It means that the event of
    the front of the car coinciding with the right-hand end of the
    garage is after or at the same time as the rear of the car
    coinciding with the left-had end of the garage.  In both diagrams
    the car is moving to the right at 0.8c so
    \gamma=sqrt{1-0.8^2}=0.6.  Consequently, in the car's reference
    frame, the garage is contracted to 6' length and when the rear of
    the car is just entering the garage, the front is
    /*simultaneously*/, in the car's reference frame, already 6'
    beyond the right-hand end of the garage.



    Then in the garage's reference frame the car's length is
    contracted to 0.6*12'=7.2' so at the moment the front of the car
    coincides with the right end of the garage, the rear of the car
    will simultaneously, in the garage reference system, be 2.8'
    inside the garage as shown below.

    Note that in the above diagram I have marked two simultaneous
    events with small \delta's.  The diagram below is just the Lorentz
    transform of the one above.  The two simultaneous \delta's are
    also in the diagram below.  You can confirm they are the same
    events by referring to the time blips along the world lines, which
    are also just the Lorentz transforms of those above.  But clearly
    the events marking the simultaneous locations of the rear and
    front of the car above are NOT simultaneous in the garage  frame
    below.  Conversely, the front and rear simultaneous locations of
    the car below are not simultaneous in the above diagram, as the
    reader is invited to confirm by plotting them.   Simultaneity is
    frame dependent.



    Incidentally, when I was in graduate school this was still know as
    the "Tank Trap Paradox".  The idea was that if one dug a tank trap
    shorter than the enemy tank, then the tank would just bridge the
    hole, UNLESS the tank were going very fast in which its contracted
    length would allow it to fall into the trap.  This was being
    explained to me by Jurgen Ehlers, whom you may correctly infer
    from his name was a German professor recently hired at Univ
    Texas.  I said, "What is it with you Germans, illustrating things
    with tank traps and cats in boxes with poison gas?"  Jurgen who
    was too young to have fought in the war didn't realize I was
    pulling his leg and he was struck speechless.

    Brent


*Brent; I have been studying your plots again. CMIIAW, but ISTM that you've recapitulated the paradox, namely that the car fits in garage in garage frame, but doesn't fit in garage in car frame. So fitting or not is frame dependent. So, IYO, does the paradox simply rest on the unfounded assumption that fitting or not is an absolute reality, and cannot be frame dependent? TY, AG*
Not exactly.  The paradox in the car/garage version is whether the doors can be closed with the car inside (assuming instantaneously operating doors).  In the garage frame it seems clear that they can be for a short time without being crashed into; so what happens in the car frame.  It happens that the simultaneous closing of the doors in the garage frame is not simultaneous in the car frame.  It's simpler to think about if we start with the exit door closed. Then in the garage frame there is a short time in which we can close the entrance door with the car inside before we have to open the exit door to avoid the car crashing into it.  Lorentz transforming these same events to the car frame shows that the exit door opens before the front of the car hits it and the back of the car has not yet entered the garage.  Then the entrance door closes after the back of the car has passed, but at this time in the car's frame the front of the car is well beyond the exit door.  So whether the car was ever completely inside the garage is frame dependent.  There is no objective fact, "The car fitted in the garage."

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/ad35e531-ef5e-4ccd-8e14-c52cd06d29da%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to