Le sam. 22 févr. 2025, 21:01, Brent Meeker <meekerbr...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > > On 2/21/2025 11:19 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote: > > You're just restating that amplitudes only matter for probabilities > because of the Born rule, which is exactly the point in question. You're > assuming what you need to prove. > > Proof is for printers, mathematicians, and whiskey. Science goes by > evidence. > > Brent > We confirmed the Born rule empirically, yes. But the question is why it holds in a purely unitary framework. If science goes by evidence, then interpretations must account for that evidence. Just stating that squared amplitudes determine frequencies doesn’t explain why they should without assuming it outright. Quentin > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/9d85ddc2-cef6-4373-91dd-a0eff1f3162b%40gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/9d85ddc2-cef6-4373-91dd-a0eff1f3162b%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAMW2kAp30%3Du2V5yU_kMe9w0obBV8dq07FSJ-im5bjnu__VQH1Q%40mail.gmail.com.
