On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 2:11 PM Russell Standish <li...@hpcoders.com.au> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 12:29:57PM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote: > > > > It does not prevent a probabilistic interpretation, but it does not give > one > > either. You have assumed statistical physics, which introduces a large > dose of > > probability theory. That does not come from the deterministic theory -- > you > > have to introduce it from elsewhere. > > > > So with quantum mechanics. The wave function, being deterministic, does > not > > have a probabilistic interpretation until you introduce one from > elsewhere. > > I'm well aware of that. I guess you're disputing the "MWI is nothing > but the Schroedinger equation" statement that John Clark sometimes > makes. > Yes. At least JC is consistent with this, as are people like Carroll, Deutsch and Wallace. I find it harder to deal with people, like Quentin, who are basically dishonest; who claim to be working with Everettian quantum mechanics, but continually introduce ideas from elsewhere -- ideas that have no basis in unitary quantum mechanics. As soon as you have self-location indeterminancy (or first person > indeterminancy, I think we called it here), probabilities march right > on in. And as soon as you have computationalism (and I would argue > functionalism), self-location indeterminancy marches right on in. That > was the point of Bruno Marchal's Universal Dovetailer Argument. > But that has never made any realistic connection with either quantum mechanics or with observational results. So the question is how would you do the MWI _without_ > probabilities. David Deutsch is working on a possible solution to > that, although I'm a little sceptical he can make it work. > I think your scepticism is not misplaced. Deutsch has a tendency to go off the rails on occasion. Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLTMga-UNDPg%2BEzKorrewxgOtzk%2BvHEeVUX097G0sWTg1w%40mail.gmail.com.