On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 16:11 +0200, Gökçen Eraslan wrote: > [...] > Now, about GSoC 2013, I would like to apply to Evince project however, I > am a bit confused about the ideasand my proposal. Is it OK to write a > proposal to implement "Several improvements to Evince"[3] or "Improve > the support for PDF Documents in GNOME"[3]? Or should I pick a specific > one for example PDF forms improvements and focus on this one instead?
Hi Gökcen, First at all, I am not an Evince developer although I am familiar with the project. AFAIK, it is fine to propose something different as long as it is clear, it is feasible to do, it is measurable and it is in the interests of Evince. You have to consider that is a equivalente of 3-month internship - ~40 hours a week. You should also consider that you can submit a proposal (or more than one proposal) and refine it as the discussion goes. > Actually since I have little experience on GTK programming I would like > to implement something more relevant to the PDF spec itself. In this > sense, PDF form enhancements (or maybe annotation improvements) is a > fine task for me. For the annotations (or anything to do in the backend), you only need glib. See below: > By the way, isn't the "Highlighting support" idea similar to annotation > improvement idea? I mean, isn't a highlight an annotation with a > "Highlight" Subtype in annotation dictionary? It is. If you implement highlight, you automatically implement strike out, underline, and squiggly as well. The missing part is the support in libpoppler-glib, because poppler already support them. The task should be to provide an API for glib to work with annotations, integrate it with the render (to show it visually) and, then, integrate it with evince. You can take a look at: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51487 In Bugzilla there is a special category for annotations. You will find 27 related bugs. You might want to check: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=583377 > In addition to the ideas in [3] and [4], I also have some rough ideas > for GSoC (forgive me if any of these was mentioned before on a bug entry > or in the mailing list etc.): > > - Reading view support: Android PDF reader and Android Adobe Reader > applications have this feature. It basically renders PDF documents as if > they are reflowable documents[5]. Here[6] is the default (page) view and > here[7] is a demonstration of the same page through the reading view > (a.k.a reflow mode). This seems actually more beneficial for > small-screen sized devices. This is: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556018 This is nice, although I would with less priority than annotations. If you decide to apply for this one, you might want to add support for crop marks: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=696353 > - Dictionary support: As its name suggest, clicking on a word and > instantly translating it would be an awesome feature. We can use > gnome-dictionary/libgdict. Although this would be nice, gnome-dictionary has limitations. -- Germán Poo-Caamaño http://calcifer.org/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ evince-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evince-list
