On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 09:45 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 22:38 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > > Of course should the programmer here have used this: > > Why? If there is a public data information, then there's no reason to > use an accessor.
True. But in the case of EMsgComposer, it would be useful to make all that data private. That way a developer could focus on replacing the internals in e-msg-composer.c, not having to care about breaking compatibility with other parts of Evolution. Which is basically why I did this patch. -- Philip Van Hoof, software developer at x-tend home: me at pvanhoof dot be gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org work: vanhoof at x-tend dot be http://www.pvanhoof.be - http://www.x-tend.be _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
