>>> Sarfraaz Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/11/05 1:02 PM >>> On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 08:05 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 16:08 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 15:12 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > > > Hey guys, > > <snip> > > > - Alarm Daemon must can start independently, > > How are accounts that require authentication (and whose passwords are > > not remembered) > > handled when evo is not already running ? > It shares the session with evo i guess. At any cost, it wont prompt for > password from tray icon :-). It wouldnt alarm those events,
>Why shouldnt the alarm popup for passwords ? The backends are anyway >enabled for authentication, expecting the clients to request for >authentication. It is not wise to popup for 'n' passwords for corresponding accounts standing from the applet. And i dont think people would prefer that, since when evo starts, it shares the session with evo. > > > > > - There will be a option in Evolution to say that whether to start alarm > > > automatically with evolution or not. > > > > > Is this option like - > > 'when-you-launch-evolution-and-find-notify-not-running-start-it' - > > yes/no ? > > ATM, Evolution users do not have a choice but don't seem to complain > > either. > Yeah. If it runs, this just ignores. I am a bit confused on the assumption here. Will alarm notify be running by default ? If yes, then i guess the option is something like "start alarm notify with evolution - yes/no". Please correct me if i am wrong. Surf, by default, it would start with evo and user can say that dont start with evo, in which case it wont start alarm. And so the option can be something similar to this. -- Sarfraaz _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers