On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 10:37 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > CamelStore::free_folder_info()'s v.method can be overridden, so it's > really up to your CamelStore implementation. > > The consumer of the ::get_folder_info() API is supposed to > call ::free_folder_info(), but since it can be overridden - you can make > it noop, free the info, or free some subset of the info (e.g. it could > free the structs but not the strings or some such if the strings point > to some internal memory). > > There are at least 2 convenience implementations in camel-store.h, one > is a noop and one is a free-all type. > > Hope that helps,
It does. Thanks a lot :-) jules > > Jeff > > On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 14:21 +0100, Jules Colding wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Please correct me if I am wrong, but I have suddenly become in doubt > > about who "owns" the memory returned by camel_store_get_folder_info(). > > > > camel_store_get_folder_info() returns a CamelFolderInfo* so the memory > > pointed returned by my provider implementation of get_folder_info() must > > be freed by the caller. Is that correct? > > > > > > Thanks, > > jules > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Evolution-hackers mailing list > > Evolution-hackers@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers > > _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
