Le jeudi 13 juillet 2006 à 11:35 +0100, Ross Burton a écrit :
> On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 12:25 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:

> > > Calendar data isn't being stored by the addressbook server either.  That
> > > isn't a great argument.
> > 
> > And I question ... do all applications that want to use calendaring (and
> > only calendaring) have to depend on most of the Evolution components?
> >
> > Right now, if you translate that to Camel and E-mailing, it depends on
> > which distribution you have. On most Redhat based ones: yes. On Debian
> > based ones: no. Is there clarity? no. Is it making it more easy to
> > develop a pure "E-mail" application and to document which dependencies
> > you have (maybe even letting packagers share the same dependencies): no.
> > 
> > The list of reasons (all valid ones, it's not because *you* mark them as
> > rant that it also *is* rant) goes on and on and on.
> So you've found a problem with the Red Hat packaging, in that it treats
> all of EDS a single library.  File a bug with Red Hat, and notice that
> Debian, Maemo, and OpenEmbedded (at least) already have split EDS
> packages.

Mandriva too ;)

Frederic Crozat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Evolution-hackers mailing list

Reply via email to