On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 08:57 +0000, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > The lovely smell of programming environment flame wars! > > Part one .... > > As the developer of an application that has an extremely high focus on > reduced memory consumption and as the author of a patch for Camel that > reduced Evolutions memory footprint with ~40 MB (maybe more, but that > number I'm certain of) . . . > > Take for example Evolution. Using ONE WEEK of hacking, I managed to > reduce its memory footprint with at least 40 MB of ram.
I don't know how many times I need to repeat, because, this keeps coming in lot different threads and I see no progress to make the patch complete. Yes, I agree, the patch does reduce *STARTUP-MEMORY-FOOT PRINT* of Evolution as mentioned by Federico in his blog, however, it is *as of now* just-a-hack that the Evolution team cannot take it *as is*. Phillip, as you keep saying the patch needs rework before considering upstream, when are we going to get it? Will the final-patch addresses all the concerns raised by me and Fejj? Guess, you are aware of the GNOME release cycle and API freeze dates. V. Varadhan Novell, Inc. Software for the Open Enterprise™ http://www.novell.com _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
