2006/10/19, Patrick Ohly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On So, 2006-10-15 at 22:57 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > * Is someone going to take care of the reported regression or do > > you need a patch to fix it? Whoever changed the code between 2.6 > > and 2.8 should be in a better position to fix it, so I am a bit > > reluctant to investigate further in code that I don't know. > > I found out what the problem is, see > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356176 > > The fix is included in that issue (add one line with a function call). > It should be easy to verify that it causes no harm and indeed fixes the > problem. Can someone commit it for E-D-S 2.8.2? > > Øystein, can you make sure that it gets included in Debian packages if > Etch would otherwise be released with an E-D-S where this bug is still > present? Should I file a bug in the Debian tracker as a reminder?
Yes and yes. I will look into it and incorporate before etch if it looks good. An entry in BTS ensures me (and the rest of the team) won't forget it.. Cheers, Øystein _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
