On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 10:02 +0000, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 09:43 +0100, Jules Colding wrote:
> > Is this really necessary?
> >
> > struct _CamelOfflineFolder {
> > CamelFolder parent_object;
> >
> > unsigned int sync_offline:1;
> > };
> >
> > Wouldn't it be much better/simpler/cleaner simply to do:
> >
> > struct _CamelOfflineFolder {
> > CamelFolder parent_object;
> >
> > gboolean sync_offline;
> > };
>
> gtypes.h says:
>
> typedef gint gboolean;
Sorry, I must be dim-witted here, but I don't understand your answer.
The present definition of CamelOfflineFolder has:
unsigned int sync_offline:1;
^^ <== bit field
I'm asking why we don't simply do:
gboolean sync_offline;
instead?
--
jules
_______________________________________________
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
