On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 16:28 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > > I suggest that on upstream CVS, Evolution should depend on the most > > recent stable versions of the libraries available in the corresponding > > GNOME release (Evolution 2.9.x/2.8.x on GNOME 2.16, 2.6.x on GNOME > > 2.14). This is similar but not exactly the same as what Matthew has > > outlined in Bug 380534. I agree that the configure scripts need to > > hard-enforce these dependencies while building the packages. > > Did you mean Evolution 2.9.x/2.10.x on GNOME 2.16? Or will Evolution > 2.10.x (which should essentially be 2.9.92 plus bug fixes) suddenly > depend on GNOME 2.18? > > I think it makes more sense for the development and _subsequent_ stable > releases to share the same library requirements. The requirements can > then be bumped when the next development cycle starts (after CVS is > branched). So, for example, 2.11.x/2.12.x will depend on GNOME 2.18. > > I agree that depending on the libraries provided by the most recent > _stable_ GNOME release is the right thing to do.
If this is what Harish meant, I agree. Ross -- Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.burtonini.com./ PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers