On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 10:05 +0000, Seb James wrote: > So, do you think it makes sense for e-d-s to expunge messages from the > unix mail spool?
It makes sense that you want to try it. Whether that also means that the Evolution Mailer maintainers will include your code is a different question. You can, however, distribute your own Camel provider and register it in the system in such a way that yours would be used if for example the url_string starts with sebjames_spool://, that way you could flock users to your implementation of the spool (in case the Evolution Mailer maintainers aren't interested) (if you register it correctly, it will even appear in the "New account" wizard of Evolution). I am, being the tinymail author, however interested in the code that you would produce. On a mobile devices (which is the target audience of the tinymail framework) it makes sense to get rid of not-needed information as soon as possible. Tinymail uses a forked version of Camel. The local providers haven't had many changes so your code would probably flow in automatically. > Thanks again for the explanation you gave, it's very helpful! No problem -- Philip Van Hoof, software developer home: me at pvanhoof dot be gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org http://www.pvanhoof.be/blog _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
