Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 18:39 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
> Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 20:21 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit :
> > Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 18:03 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
> > > Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 19:24 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit :
> > > > Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 17:19 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
> > > > > Hi Evolution / E-D-S maintainers,
> > > > > 
> > > > > it appears that since CVS to SVN migration, no evolution / e-d-s 
> > > > > release
> > > > > was followed by a SVN tag creation in <module_name>/tags.
> > > > > 
> > > > > These tags are very useful for you, maintainers but also for
> > > > > contributors and vendors when they try to search for changes between
> > > > > releases.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Could you try to create those missing tags and make sure they are
> > > > > created when releasing new tarballs in the future (I guess somebody
> > > > > script was not migrated correctly to SVN ;) ?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks you in advance.
> > > > 
> > > > in fact it seems evolution uses branches over tags
> > > > 
> > > > evolution stable branch can be found at :
> > > >  http://svn.gnome.org/svn/evolution/branches/gnome-2-18
> > > 
> > > Branches and tags are different beast :
> > > -branches are used to do developement for a particular release of GNOME
> > > (here 2.18.x series)
> > > -tags are pointing each release (ie tarball generation), regardless of
> > > branches.
> > > 
> > sorry I was unclear. I meant that afaics, evolution never tagged
> > releases, or something definitely got lost in the cvs->svn transition.
> 
> They did, check :
> svn ls http://svn.gnome.org/svn/evolution/tags/ | grep EVOL 
> 
indeed, case sensitivity got me :)

sorry for the confusion
-- 
Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

_______________________________________________
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Reply via email to