I probably wouldn't get rid of mail/README.async, that's useful knowledge in there iirc.
Jeff On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 15:14 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > With GNOME 2.22 development just now getting under way, this seems like > a good time for some fall cleaning. There's quite a few files still > living in Subversion trunk that we did not ship for GNOME 2.20. > > I've filed a series of bug reports about this, hoping that we can > collectively sift through the lists and decide what should stay and what > should go, as maybe spot files we *should* have shipped that got > overlooked. > > I'm of the opinion that, in general, trunk should only contain what we > ship. If we need to resurrect a file down the road we can always fetch > it from SCM archives. Keeping dead, unshipped source code files in > trunk is especially detrimental to developers because someone will > inevitably waste time maintaining them, not realizing or forgetting > they're dead. I've lost track of the number of times this has happened > to me. > > Here's the list of bug reports. Please to comments about specific files > to the appropriate bug. > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478704 (Evolution) > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478692 (Evolution-Data-Server) > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478680 (Evolution-Exchange) > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478670 (GtkHtml) > > Matthew Barnes > > _______________________________________________ > Evolution-hackers mailing list > Evolution-hackers@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers