On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 14:34 +0200, Jules Colding wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 08:23 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:11 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> > > This also would do. But normally we would bump it during the next dot
> > > release. Anyways is fine IMO.
> > 
> > Hi Srini,
> > 
> > I think we still have a misunderstanding here.  The latest revision of
> > Subversion trunk still has the version in configure.in at 3.15.92 and
> > the latest ChangeLog entry is:
> > 
> >     2007-09-03  Srinivasa Ragavan  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> >             ** GtkHTML 3.15.92 release
> > 
> >             * NEWS, configure.in:
> > 
> > But the latest ChangeLog entry in the 3.16.0 tarball is:
> > 
> >     2007-09-17  Srinivasa Ragavan  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> >             ** GtkHTML 3.16.0 release
> > 
> >             * NEWS:
> >             * configure.in:
> > 
> > So it looks like at least the ChangeLog, NEWS, and configure.in changes
> > prior to the 3.16.0 tarball upload were never committed.
> 
> Which, BTW, is still the case for evolution (version 2.11.92 in svn) and
> e-d-s (version 1.11.92 in svn). The changes up to and including x.12.0
> must still be on someones disk.

It is there in gnome-2-20 branch as well. It isn't there in trunk. 

-Srini.

> 
> Please commit.
> 
> Thanks,
>   jules
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Reply via email to