It was supposed to be GPLv2 or LGPLv2 (forget which), but without the "or later" clause.
Jeff On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 16:19 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > Philip, > > This is observed in Evolution also. The OpenChange hackers brought to > our notice and I'm with the Novell legal team to get this resolved > altogether. But that process seems like taking time and I have to wait a > but before doing anything. > > -Srini. > > On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 12:08 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > The README.COPYRIGHT of EDS's Camel states: > > > > * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > > * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as > > * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the > > * License, or (at your option) any later version. > > > > Whereas a lot of files (like, camel-address.c, to pick one example) state: > > > > * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > > * modify it under the terms of version 2 of the GNU Lesser General Public > > * License as published by the Free Software Foundation. > > > > It looks like EDS's COPYING file also uses the "any later version" > > version of the GPL v2. > > > > I'm not sure whether it's a good idea to have mixed licenses for one > > piece of code (being Camel). Would it be possible to change the license > > of all of EDS's files to be the same? > > > > Note that Novell/Ximian seems to be the copyright holder of all files, > > that of course means this organisation makes this decision. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > _______________________________________________ > Evolution-hackers mailing list > Evolutionfirstname.lastname@example.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolutionemail@example.com http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers