On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 17:14 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 10:52 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > I have far better fixes in GMime that need to be ported to Camel. > > > > Porting GMime to Camel would be an interesting effort indeed. Perhaps > just replacing CamelMimePart with GMime.
Well... I hadn't exactly meant that it would be a good idea to necessarily replace Camel's MIME parser/objects with GMime. I had simply meant for Camel to lift GMime's rfc2047 decoder logic which does more with charset fallback than Camel currently does... plus it also is a bit more liberal in decoding malformed rfc2047 encoded-word tokens (well, assuming ENABLE_RFC2047_WORKAROUNDS is defined...). Jeff _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolutionemail@example.com http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers