Le mardi 23 octobre 2007 à 13:55 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : > On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 09:53 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote: > > Le mardi 23 octobre 2007 à 13:01 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : > > > On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 09:19 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 12:07 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > > > For Evolution 2.22 we should be having MAPI based Exchange connector > > > > > which developed in parallel with Openchange based libmapi. The team is > > > > > currently working on that and the code is currently maintianed at > > > > > GNOME > > > > > SVN in EXCHANGE_MAPI_BRANCH (both for evolution and > > > > > evolution-data-server) > > > > > > > > > > http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/evolution/branches/EXCHANGE_MAPI_BRANCH/ > > > > > http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/evolution-data-server/branches/EXCHANGE_MAPI_BRANCH/ > > > > > > > > > > I created the branch yesterday and we committed our week long effort > > > > > there. We now have a working account setup plugin, base camel/calendar > > > > > code and a partially working addressbook impl. Things should get to a > > > > > working shape in another week or two. I hope that soon, Johnny would > > > > > be > > > > > able to create a OpenSUSE Build Service repository (rpms for OpenSUSE, > > > > > Fedora, Ubuntu and few more) for Evolution and its dependencies so > > > > > that > > > > > users can install the rpms and get a feel of it even before the > > > > > release. > > > > > > > > Does this mean that evo + e-d-s will go GPLv3? > > > > > > Jules, as I replied in a previous email thread, Im working with Novell > > > legal team to modify the license to either GPLV2 or later or > > > dual-license Evolution/EDS under GPLv2 and GPLv3. I dont have yet > > > received the final nod. But the mapi providers/plugins are developed > > > under GPLv3 which can be a issue now, but may not be after the license > > > change. > > > > Well, it will be also a problem for other applications linking with > > e-d-s libraries. > > Since EDS is LGPLv2, it may not have much issues. IIRC when Harish moved > EDS from GPL to LGPL, he made it LGPLv2 or later. (I'm not a licensing > expert. Just posting from what we had discussed sometime back on e-h > list).
>From what I see in SVN, EDS is still LGPLv2 only, not v2 or later. But I don't know what it would mean if E-D-S was linked with GPLv3 library (ie Samba 4), for other programs linking to E-D-S library, with an non GPLv3 compatible license (like explained on http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility ) -- Frederic Crozat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mandriva _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
