Andre, On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 01:23 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 12.12.2007, 13:58 -0500 schrieb Matthew Barnes: > > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 23:21 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > > > Frame files are the master copies here. > > the master copy should be in svn, in a format that i can open && edit. > having it in on someone's personal computer in some company is not my > understanding of community software. > > > > You think committing Frame files to svn would solve it? If so, I would > > > be happy to do that. > > if novell buys a framemaker copy for every contributor who wants to edit > the evolution user docs, i can live with that workaround. ;-) > seriously: it won't solve your problem that any changes have to be > manually "backported" from the svn version to novell's file, and i guess > that could become a lot of work.
I said that but I didn't mean it ;-). > > > > I'm open to propose a new tool to the doc team here for Evolution if > > > any. Definitely hand editing the entire doc file isn't going to be > > > easy. > > Agreed. I'm a bit out of my element here. Maybe Andre can chime in > > with some suggestions. What tools does the GNOME documentation team > > use? Surely we're beyond hand-editing XML files (/me hopes). > > > > Here's a few possibilities, but I don't much about them: > > http://wiki.docbook.org/topic/DocBookAuthoringTools > > i'm also not a doc writer, i only know of emacs users, and that's most > likely not an option here. i've already asked for feedback on the > gnome-doc-list, but srini may of course also blog about it (we're so > web2.0y, aren't we?), explaining the issue and asking doc writers for > feedback...? > Sure, I would do that. -Srini _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolutionfirstname.lastname@example.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers