On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 15:03 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 19:33 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > > The best is that if you could track it down to Evolution, file a > bug > > > with the valgrind traces and CC me there. > > > > ... this is exactly what I won't have time for - sorry! I was hoping > > that some other developer would perhaps be motivated to use valgrind to > > analyse some of these problems. > > I run Evolution and E-D-S under valgrind occasionally but haven't made a > regular habit of it. I'll try to start doing that regularly.
Great, here's a good reason to fire it up: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524964 Hint: your changes seem to be involved in the use-after-free and ensuing crash found in the nightly testing ;-) My offer still stands: I could add interested developers to CC of the emails which report nightly test success or failure. I look at the results rather sporadically; this time only two days have passed since the tests started to fail, but it could easily be a week or more. The tests still produce new valgrind leak reports for which I don't have suppression rules; in particular the "potentially lost" reports seem to be a bit random. Currently I'm still in the "ignore leaks" mode and just suppress anything that I find. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolutionemail@example.com http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers