On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 11:09 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 06:15 -0600, P Chenthill wrote:
> > We would still need to maintain the old data to know the history though
> > they may become obsolete. Certainly a lot of things mentioned still hold
> > true ;)
> 
> A compromise might be to only migrate the pages with current and
> accurate information to l.g.o, and keep go-evolution.org around as a
> historical archive.  Archived pages brought back to life at a later date
> could be migrated individually.  It -is- a wiki, after all.
> 
> Might be interesting to compile a list of pages we still maintain or
> care about.  I have a few not listed on the front page (BugzillaTopics
> and ReleaseHOWTO, for example).
> 
> Perhaps a bigger issue is converting the page markup.  I've noticed
> syntactic differences between the two sites [1], but I don't even know
> what wiki software the two sites are using.  Need to see if there's
> markup migration scripts out there.
> 
> Matthew Barnes
> 
> 
> [1] live.gnome.org's markup syntax seems way more expressive and is
>     actually DOCUMENTED! (http://live.gnome.org/HelpOnEditing)  Unlike
>     our own. (http://www.go-evolution.org/Help:Editing)  Not to mention
>     the style sheets are prettier.


**IMHO** I would prefer live.gnome.org . So +1 for that.

And somebody suggested that we can redirect go-evolution.org domain to
live.gnome.org/evolution 


-- 
Johnny (johnnyjacob.wordpress.com | johnnyjacob.org)
"May you share freely, never taking more than you give "

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Reply via email to