On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 12:39 +0000, Michael Meeks wrote: > Does anyone object if instead of g_file_set_contents we just use fopen, > fwrite, fclose ? any API method that does fsync is just a disaster-area > for latency on a loaded ext3 system; and it is -totally- un-necessary to > have some heavy-lifting transactional guarentees for an utter > corner-case, for a non-critical file anyway :-)
I would prefer g_file_replace_contents_async() for cases like this. Matthew Barnes _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
