On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 12:39 +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
>       Does anyone object if instead of g_file_set_contents we just use fopen,
> fwrite, fclose ? any API method that does fsync is just a disaster-area
> for latency on a loaded ext3 system; and it is -totally- un-necessary to
> have some heavy-lifting transactional guarentees for an utter
> corner-case, for a non-critical file anyway :-)

I would prefer g_file_replace_contents_async() for cases like this.

Matthew Barnes

Evolution-hackers mailing list

Reply via email to