Hi there,

reading about the new IMAPX implementation used by Evo >=2.30, I found it
stated that

  "Maybe if imapx had come up before, many backends such as groupwise, mapi
   etc. would have followed this design rather than a sync one."
                        -- Chenthill in [1]

Does this mean that the Camel IMAPX code is ready to support a backend like
ours (for Kolab2) to be implemented as an async one rather than a sync one
(which is the case for the MAPI-, Exchange- and SCALIX-Backends (and maybe
others, too))?

Best regards,



kernel concepts GbR        Tel: +49-271-771091-14
Sieghuetter Hauptweg 48    Fax: +49-271-771091-19
D-57072 Siegen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

evolution-hackers mailing list
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...

Reply via email to