On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 12:58 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > I wasn't planning to do any of the actual crypto code directly in > Evolution; I was planning to use NSS for that. The additional > functionality would presumably live inside #ifdef CAMEL_HAVE_NSS, like a > lot of other code in e-d-s already does.
Only thing I ask is to not make Camel lean on E-D-S libraries any more than it already does, even if that means duplicating some code in Camel and E-D-S. Although Camel still links to libedataserver for historical reasons, conceptually at least it resides lower in the shared library stack than E-D-S, alongside things like libsoup. I've been trying to nudge Camel toward severing that dependency for quite a while now. _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list email@example.com To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers