On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 14:34 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 17:08 +0400, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > > could you use Gnome's bugzilla for patch reviews, please? > > > > Consider this more an RFC requiring feedback than a patch requiring > > review. > > For Evo-EWS I'm much happier with patches in email anyway. I find it a > lot easier to review patches, and to apply them with 'git am', if they > are in email. > > I'm going to get notified by email *anyway* — that's how I learn about > new bugs in bugzilla too. So it's just a question of whether all the > information I need is right there in the email when I first see it, or > whether I have to go grubbing around in a web browser to find it, > download it, and then play silly buggers to apply it and get the > authorship right.
OK, if that's what you want, that's fine by me, since it's my usual workflow. > In fact, James, if you're going to make a habit of sending patches for > Evo-EWS why not just get an account in GNOME git and apply them > directly? :) > > http://live.gnome.org/NewAccounts I think you probably need me to get a feel for evolution development initially before you set me loose in the repo ... Incidentally, I presume you use bugzilla for bugs? I just ran across one experimenting with Categories. Apparently if I change the category on the outlook webserver, it causes us to delete the email (with or without my patch applied). James _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list email@example.com To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers