On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 16:58 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 21:27 +0000, Philip Withnall wrote: > > This sounds good. Do I have to make any fixes to the Google Contacts > > address book backend, or will it all be handled centrally? (i.e. With > > this GNetworkMonitor change, will there be any bugs left in the Google > > backend’s handling of online/offline status?) > > The EBackend base class already has an "online" boolean property. > Backend modules just have to honor it. > > For 3.4 we can just bind it to GNetworkMonitor:network-available if > linking to GLib >= 2.31. > > For 3.6 I'd like to have each EBackend manage its own "online" state by > calling g_network_monitor_can_reach() in response to "network-changed" > signals from GNetworkMonitor. Then we get VPN awareness for free! > > In either case it's all handled in the base class.
Here are the patches: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669487 _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers