On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 09:19 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 14:47 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > > Well, they do not do it right, and this kind of "outsourcing" proved to > > be problematic in the past, thus why to rely on something nonworking > > with "not our fault, ask them to fix it" explanation? I always thought > > we do software for people, not people for software. > > Consistency with other GTK+ applications is more important. > > If GtkFileChooser has chosen a bad policy, try and open a discussion > with Federico about it. Don't just circumvent the policy. I would > consider that a regression.
I strongly disagree that consistency with other Gtk+ applications is more important than basic usability. The GtkFileChooser is just stunningly broken — and by accepting its stupidity wholesale, that means that Evolution has regressed in usability. I agree with Milan that we should switch back to how we were doing things before. -- dwmw2
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list email@example.com To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers