On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Matthew Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 13:12 -0300, Sasa Ostrouska wrote: > > Hi I was just wondering if is there a special reason to use > > geocode-glib version 0.99.0 as there is > > > > already out a 0.99.2 so would be nice to have in configure.ac > > geocode-glib >= 0.99.0 instead of geocode-glib = 0.99.0 > > There were substantial API changes on the master branch of geocode-glib > that we don't yet support. > > Ok understood. > I don't yet know if 0.99.2 includes those changes or if it's backward > compatible with 0.99.0. > > The changes are listed here: http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/GNOME/sources/geocode-glib/0.99/geocode-glib-0.99.1.changes and http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/GNOME/sources/geocode-glib/0.99/geocode-glib-0.99.2.changes but i think the .news files are easier to read: http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/GNOME/sources/geocode-glib/0.99/geocode-glib-0.99.1.news http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/GNOME/sources/geocode-glib/0.99/geocode-glib-0.99.2.news If it's backward compatible then we can support it for Evolution 3.10, > otherwise it has to wait for Evolution 3.11/3.12. > > Matthew Barnes > > Ok thanks for the answer. Rgds Saxa
_______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
