On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 20:14 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote: > > [0]: A note on semantics of opening a client, we really should be > deprecating the DRA specific semantics in favor of making DRA the > default and just falling back on pure DBus in the case where DRA > is unavailable, this was the original plan, and would make for > one less 'technique' of opening the client, which is really just > API bloat at this point, anyway.
Which back ends still don't support DRA? I fixed EWS but at that time ISTR there were still some which weren't supporting it. I'd quite like to merge evolution-pkcs11 at some point... -- dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
