Hi, Oh, I had not seen E_TYPE_CAL_OBJ_MOD_TYPE. I was thinking about the scope of the modifications on a recurrent event, I'm trying another aproach though.
Thank you for your kind support, Best regards, 2017-02-10 9:22 GMT+01:00 Milan Crha <[email protected]>: > On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 21:51 +0100, Iñigo Martínez wrote: >> g_object_class_install_property (object_class, >> PROP_MOD_TYPE, >> g_param_spec_enum ("mod-type", >> "Modification type", >> "The modification type of the event", >> ECalObjModType, >> E_CAL_OBJ_MOD_THIS, >> G_PARAM_READWRITE)); > > Hi, > check the documentation of the g_param_spec_enum(), the parameter is > meant to be a GType, but you pass it an enum name instead. The proper > value comes from e-cal-enum-types.h (included through > libecal/libecal.h, in this case E_TYPE_CAL_OBJ_MOD_TYPE. > > By the way, why do you want an object property "mod-type"? It's usually > used as a function argument, not much useful as the object property, > from my point of view. Or you use it as some sort of default? > Bye, > Milan > _______________________________________________ > evolution-hackers mailing list > [email protected] > To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
