On February 25, 2003 02:17 am, Not Zed wrote: > Did you add shell/test/Makefile.am to configure.in?
I only have a simple Makefile in shell/test/ so it doesn't need to be generated. > Probably have to do autogen.sh to pick up all the changes to the config > files (at least, that's the easiest way). > > What do you mean the library hasn't been linked? You're getting linking > failures? By that I mean that the library has been built (make was run in test/Makefile) but test/test.a doesn't actually get linked into the final evolution binary. > On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 08:00, Sharvil Nanavati wrote: > > Good day, > > > > I'd like to link the Evolution (1.2.2) shell with another static library > > located in, say, shell/test/. In order to do this, I modified Makefile.am > > in shell/ and added "test" to SUBDIRS. I also added "test/test.a" to > > evolution_LDADD. I ran make clean, automake, configure, and make but the > > library still hasn't been linked into the evolution binary. Am I using > > the right approach? Is there anything I've missed? Any hints, clues, etc. > > as to why I'm unsuccessful? Any help is appreciated. Thanks! > > > > Cheers, > > Sharvil Nanavati > > _______________________________________________ > > evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers > > _______________________________________________ > evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
