Hi Chris,
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 01:58, Chris Toshok wrote:
> These two functions are just sugar around g_object_set/g_object_get at
> the moment.. They don't necessarily need to be there at all, but if they
> are I'd like them to remain easier/less typing than g_object_set/get,
> not more :)
Ah - ok :-) of course g_object_set/get gives a really tight, implicit
contract too I suppose.
> yeah, definitely. I'll add those tonight.
Great :-)
Regards,
Michael.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
