On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 16:47, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > I don't know much about libgda so excuse me if it's a dumb question, > > but: wouldn't it be better to work on fixing the current APIs (as Christ > > as been doing with EBook) instead of writing a libgda provider? > > > yes, maybe. Although as AbiWord and Gnumeric are already using libgda as > a way of accessing different data sources (databases, XML files, dBase > files), adding support to access Evolution data as alibgd a provider was > the simplest way for giving access to those apps to Evo data.
OK, makes sense. I guess I was not aware about how far along the libgda integration in GNOME Office has gone... :-) However, I don't think libgda would work as a general way for other apps to access Evolution's data -- we need to get going on the CalClient / EBook improvements. -- Ettore _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
