Hey Joe, > > Basically it does two things: > > - instead of syncing only read messages, it always syncs all messages > > when you go offline > > Is this going to cause a significantly larger overhead when going > offline than before on high volume mailboxes? My IMAP INBOX is 75,000 > messages, and if each needs to be checked before going offline, it is > going to be painful. (Aside from the one-time sync everything that I'm > aware I'll have to suffer)
I'm not sure, I'd appreciate any feedback on how well it scales actually. I think ... unless you have a lot of messages which were meant to be synced in the past that weren't ... it should be pretty cheap - its all local file-system accesses in the already-synced case. Z _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
