On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 08:10, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 21:14, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
> > I don't like keeping generated files in CVS. If we edit the lex file, or > > apply changes from upstream, it is likely to cause trouble. > Why ? the time-stamp will be updated on an upstream-merge - and when > you run make, new lexer source will be generated. If you don't test the Broken clocks... > changes before you commit - then people try to compile and it breaks > unless they have RandomFlex-1.2.3 - but how likely is committing without > testing ? ;-> I believe the same argument can be made for configure and Makefile.in. A lot of people have problems with automake et al, problems that would be solved if you could build CVS source just like a tarball. So shouldn't we keep that in CVS too? -- Hans Petter _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
