Hi there,
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 22:02, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 14:42, Larry Ewing wrote:
> > Judging by a couple of reports I've seen like this I'd be willing to bet
> > that gnome-2.4's backward compatability is far from perfect. I guess
> > we'll try to address these problems as we find them.
They need fixing - these are indeed serious bugs in Gnome 2.4.0 that we
need fixed for 2.4.1.
> At least I have definitely seen a GNOME 2.2 compiled Evolution having
> trouble going offline when running under GNOME 2.4.
Right;
> It seems that something changed in ORBit that makes old skels not work
> with the current version of the lib in some cases, but I haven't had a
> chance to track it down yet...
I just looked at this again; my first check - running our horribly
complex regression test suite compiled against 2.2 linking to 2.4 worked
fine. I even went back to the 2.0 regression test suite compiled vs. 2.0
and run vs. 2.4 - again no problem.
I guess in which case, it's likely to be a simple ORB bug that's been
introduced somehow that's breaking something not covered by the
regression tests; I'm construction some more tests based on the stack
trace that Ettore sent me now.
HTH,
Michael.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
