And also ... apart from the fact body searches aren't used that much, even for filtering, it stops as soon as it has enough to make a match, so it might not necessarily download all parts. I think attachments are skipped anyway (its really a 'body text' match), but I think spam filters need the whole kit and kaboodle.> > or will we now just always download entire messages when the user opens > > an imap folder? this would suck. > > Isn't this what we do for filters which rely on the contents of the body > already? (either a "body contains" or a "pipe to program" now, right?) yes, but only if that body-matches (or pipe-to-program) filter gets run. at which point you're asking for it anyway... these are also not used by default :-)
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam filtering Radek Doul�k
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam filtering Anna Marie Dirks
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam filtering Radek Doul�k
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam filtering Mark Gordon
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam filter... Radek Doul�k
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam filter... Anna Marie Dirks
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam fi... Calum Benson
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam filtering Jeffrey Stedfast
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam filtering Joe Shaw
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam filtering Jeffrey Stedfast
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam filtering Radek Doul�k
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam filtering guenther
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam filtering Curtis C. Hovey
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam filtering Not Zed
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam filtering Radek Doul�k
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam filtering Bj�rn Torkelsson
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam filtering Brett Johnson
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam filtering Ettore Perazzoli
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam filtering Radek Doul�k
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam filtering Ettore Perazzoli
