On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 13:38, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 15:24, Chris Toshok wrote: > > Sending mail instead of just doing them myself because they have affect > > packaging/other people :) > > > > 1. Rev the openldap dependency to >= 2.1.22 > > > > openldap.org currently shows 2.1.22 as the stable/release version. > > There's really no reason for us to be using a release that for all > > intents and purposes can be referred to as "historical" :) > > This would raise the bar for those who want to build from source though > (most (all?) distros are still at 2.0). That would be bad... > > Is there a reason to switch to 2.1 (e.g. new features we need) aside > from obsolescence?
SASL auth support is much better on the server side. I don't know of any pressing client side issues that would be solved by moving to 2.1, though. I guess I could check the release notes for the client libs. > > 2. Put AM_DISABLE_STATIC in the configure.in > > I'm all for this. I build with --disable-static myself anyways, and it > works fine (and as you pointed out, it cuts the build time in half). is the pas/pcs library stuff an issue? is there any harm in switching them from .a's to .so's? Chris _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
